Ten Things: 2024 in Books
Here are ten books I read and liked last year.
- Roland Allen, The Notebook (nonfiction, 2024). I don’t think there was a book released this past year that was more my shit than this one, a wide-ranging and thoroughly researched history of the humble notebook, from its mercantile origins in 14th century Italy through the commonplace book era to the bujo boom of today. It’s heartening to see that for almost as long as we’ve been writing things down for ourselves, we’ve been using it as a place to figure out the world around us, including ourselves. Every Field Notes has the truth printed inside of it: “I'm not writing it down to remember it later, I'm writing it down to remember it now.”
- Sarah Bakewell, How to Live (nonfiction, 2011). This overview of the life and work of French writer and statesman Michel de Montaigne has a very Montaingesque structure: twenty attempts to answer to the titular question. The root of “essay,” after all, is the French verb essayer, or “to try.” The Notebook was in part about the ways we came to exteriorize out thoughts and ideas on paper, and few people in recorded history did so with as much relish and as little regard for internal consistency as Montaigne. Of course, this was part of the process: Montaigne was demonstrating his trains of though to better think through any given topic. This is a refreshing approach to decorticating something in an era of speed and instantaneity.
- Robert Bresson, Notes on the Cinematograph (nonfiction, 1975). Oblique Strategies for the Letterboxd set. Something to be consulted, not necessarily read through. Fascinating insights about filmmaking from a legendary and idiosyncratic filmmaker.
- Roy Peter Clark, How to Write Short (nonfiction, 2013). Writing long has its benefits; just ask Montaigne, who did so to tease out this thoughts about this topic or that. The benefit of writing short is when you know what you want to say, but want to maximize its punchiness. It is clear throughout that Clark (who I always confuse with Roy Thomas Baker, the guy who made Queen sound like Queen) has honed his writing advice over a lifetime in journalism, academia, and coaching. The advice itself isn’t particularly novel: keep it tight, pick strong words, be ruthless if need be. What makes this book interesting is the breadth of the examples Clark uses to make his point: tweets, dating profiles, baseball card copy, engagement-bait Facebook quizzes, poems, puns, T-shirts for sale on the boardwalk. It’s like J-school riff on that Jim Jarmusch quote about originality: “Devour old films, new films, music, books, paintings, photographs, poems, dreams, random conversations, architecture, bridges, street signs, trees, clouds, bodies of water, light and shadows,” it’s all good.
- Kyle Chayka, Filterworld (nonfiction, 2024). The best thing I read all year, and also the book that made me do the Rick Dalton meme in recognition the most frequently, so specific were the observations and even the recommendations (I know Chayka is my brother because he too is a fan of Hiroshi Sato’s Awakening). Chayka, a writer for the New Yorker whose Infinite Scroll column is required reading, argues that the algorithm, and by extension Big Tech, flattens culture into a mushy flavourless middle, and that our various social media feeds kill our curiosity while fighting tooth and nail for our attention. What we take in is more and more imposed on us, and how we consume it has become more frictionless, passive, optimized. We must revel in the joyous friction of seeking things out for ourselves. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: the best algorithm is the cool people you know, because cool people like cool things. (Further reading: I also read and liked Chayka’s book about the history of minimalism, The Longing for Less.
- Maria Konnikova, The Biggest Bluff (nonfiction, 2020). There’s something irresistible to me about a curious newcomer trying to break into a niche competitive domain, and the more niche the better. Consider my fondness for Stefan Fatsis’ Word Freak, a book that in no small part set me on my correct competitive Scrabble path, or the work of the Paper Lion himself, George Plimpton. I found Konnikova’s journey into the heart of competitive poker to be absorbing and alluring; there are through lines about the relationship between skill and luck, what you can and cannot control, and the overwhelming power of cognitive biases. “Less certainty, more inquiry” indeed. Pair it with Jon Bois’ Pretty Good video about poker.
- Jason Kirk, Hell Is a World Without You (fiction, 2024). I didn’t grow up in the church. But I grew up in West Québec, which is still pretty church-adjacent, or church-adjacent enough for me to have had a high school girlfriend who signed one of my yearbooks with a screed against evolution (Rachel, if you ever see this, what’s up) and came to school armed with literature (I might be conflating two people here, cut me some slack, it’s been 20 years). But one thing I was for sure was a 14-year-old social outcast navigating friendships and romance and my own sense of guilt between sessions of Soul Calibur II and NHL Hitz 2003 with the homies. Kirk, a sports journalist and co-host of the venerable Shutdown Fullcast, writes with great humour and empathy about growing up Evangelical, and gleefully channels his inner puerile 14-year-old in the book’s funnier passage, which are legion.
- Patrick O’Reilly, Demographics Report, November, 2023 (poetry, 2024). Full disclosure, Patrick is a friend, and Cactus Press put out my own chapbook back in 2021, but if I’m not going to rep my scene, who the hell will? Most of Demographics Report is a long, bleakly funny modernist poem attempting to catalogue, in the spirit of Georges Perec, the comings and goings of a city’s fauna, humans included. This slot could also have gone to Sahand Fariva’s beautiful Thirteen Sonnets or local legend Lou Vani’s Moon Rock Writes, which both feel classical in their own way.
- Oliver Roeder, Seven Games (nonfiction, 2024). More than a pocket history of the titular seven games (checkers, chess, go, backgammon, poker, Scrabble, bridge), Roeder’s book is especially interesting when humans build machines that end up being so good at playing games that the best of us start playing like them (this is especially evident in the chapter about chess); the existential issue is, as Roeder puts it, the machines can’t explain themselves to us. There’s also the thorough line of computer scientists seemingly treating games as a problem to be solved rather than an elegant expression of human creativity.
- Tracy K. Smith, Life on Mars (poetry, 2011). The best poetry collection I read this year. Works in the same way as the best science fiction: ideas and feelings refracted through future tech and the sheer vastness of the Universe.